- #Is mono framework safe for macbook pro pro
- #Is mono framework safe for macbook pro Pc
- #Is mono framework safe for macbook pro mac
#Is mono framework safe for macbook pro pro
I was streaming it on my personal 2013 MacBook air (which is a great little machine but ready for an upgrade), and then glanced at my work Macbook Pro and its external display.
#Is mono framework safe for macbook pro mac
When the presentation showed it, I looked at the very display of the Mac laptop I was watching it on and sure enough, there was a gap in the menu bar where the notch would be, with the menu items on the left and the clock and all those little widget icons on the right. I couldn't for the life of me think why it mattered. I ordered mine on release day and am eagerly awaiting its delivery. The only downside I can see is if you have a light colored menu bar or background and don't like the look of it when not fullscreen, however my menubar is always black anyways so I don't see that being an issue at all. I much prefer this implementation to what they did on the iPhone with the notch cutting into fullscreen images and videos. However, when you're doing something fullscreen (like watching a video) the screen on either side of the notch is blacked out so you're left with a standard sized screen for viewing your content (with no visible notch). This means when not using fullscreen apps, you gain some screen real-estate because the menu bar now has dedicated space for it. You should look into the actual implementation of the notch and I think you'll be pleased! Imagine the exact same screen as your 2019 macbook pro, but instead of black bezel on the left and the right of the camera, you have the menu bar instead.Įverything beneath the notch is the same size as the screen on previous laptops, so the notch allows for extra space beyond the 16x10 that you're used to. The simplicity take goes away when you consider that supporting 4 USB-C ports that behave differently due to limitations on power envelope and Thunderbolt chipset doesn't really simplify the design for cost-cutting. My personal opinion is that Ive's vision for Apple's design future was of ever slimmer and slicker pieces of hardware, USB-C helped a lot this vision to simplify design lines, streamline the ports layout and so on. The touch bar invalidates a lot of these assumptions.
They did some calculation based on how well people are locked in and how many will buy a new mac and went with the most profitable option up until the time for the great transition comes. I think they aimed for the simplicity at management level and not at design level. Every non-off-the-shelf piece puts multiple teams in to work in multiple continents and this costs money.
Every little thing that they add makes the thing more complicated to manufacture, thus more expensive. > IMHO It wasn't a design decision but a business one and I think the removal of mag-safe is a giveaway.
#Is mono framework safe for macbook pro Pc
Nice Windows laptops are a very new phenomenon, up until very recently the best trackpad on a PC laptop wasn't even on the same league with Apple's. Until very recently the PC industry was racing to the bottom and Apple did not have a reason to compete on features. Every little thing that they add makes the thing more complicated to manufacture, thus more expensive.Įvery non-off-the-shelf piece puts multiple teams in to work on multiple continents and this costs money. IMHO It wasn't a design decision but a business one and I think the removal of mag-safe is a giveaway. What was the bet you say? I think they bet that the shift to USB-C/Thunderbolt/Wireless will happen quickly and they can help with the push and increase their margins. My guess is that Apple bet on something that did not materialise, it wasn't about Jony Ive not caring about user feedback.
0 kommentar(er)
